Appellant filed Letters Patent Appeal stating it had reinstated the concerned person and provided all benefits. Court held nothing further survived in the matter and disposed of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
LPA68.09.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
KJ
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.68 OF 2009 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.792 OF 1999
Shikshan prasarak Mandal )..Appellant Vs. Shri Uttam Hariba bhandare & ors. )..Respondents
Mrs.Anita A.Agarwal for the appellant. Mr.S.S.Pakale for respondent no.1. Mr.S.N.Patil AGP for respondent no.2.
CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR &
MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 15/12/2010.
PC
1 Learned Advocate for the appellant states that the appellant
has already reinstated the concerned person in service and has given all necessary benefits to him as per the order of the Court.
She submitted that nothing further survives in the matter. Letters Patent Appeal is accordingly disposed of.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J) (P.B.MAJMUDAR,J)
Shikshan Prasarak Mandal
Shri Uttam Hariba Bhandare
Mrs. Anita A. Agarwal
P.B. MAJMUDAR
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court