Sridhar Ramchandra Kanolkar v. Dy.Collector (Dev) L.A.O.
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal is dismissed under Order 41 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. No reasons were given.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
FIRST APPEAL NO. 116 OF 2002
SRIDHAR RAMCHANDRA KANOLKAR ... Appellant Versus DY.COLLECTOR (DEV) L.A.O. ... Respondents
Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
Coram:D. G. KARNIK, J. Date:24th September, 2010
P.C.
None present for the appellant.
Respondent present.
Appeal is dismissed under Order 41 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
D. G. KARNIK, J.
MF/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRIDHAR RAMCHANDRA KANOLKAR
DY.COLLECTOR (DEV) L.A.O.
D. G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court