The applicant sought to withdraw a lisping civil application pending since 2008 to file a fresh one. The High Court at Bombay disposed of the application acknowledging the withdrawal with liberty to preserve contentions.
Civil application disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty; contentions kept open. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cas1005.08.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1005 OF 2008 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 857 OF 2002
Bhau Hari Patil & Ors.
....Applicants.
Vs.
Devba Krishna Hale & Patil & Ors.
....Respondents.
Mr. S.S. Patwardhan for the Applicants. Mr. S.S. Shah for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 23rd September, 2010
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the Applicants seeks to withdraw the present Civil Application, for filing a fresh application with relevant details. There is no order passed in this application since 2008. Even otherwise, for appropriate interim reliefs, in a suit, it is necessary to bring on record upto date and proper events. In view of this, the Civil Application is disposed of, with liberty. All the contentions are kept open.
2 The Civil Application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Bhau Hari Patil & Ors.
Devba Krishna Hale & Patil & Ors.
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
