Application by Union of India to delete its name from an election petition was allowed upon the petitioner's consent, with the party deleted from the record within a week.
Deleted Respondent No.4 (Union of India) from the array of parties in the Election Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
aep22.10.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2010
IN
ELECTION PETITION NO. 7 OF 2009
Mr. Dahyabhai Vallabhai Patel
....Petitioner.
Vs.
Mr. Lalubhai Patel & Ors.
....Respondent.
Mr. V.R. Chatrapati with Mr. Rajendra Kumar for the Applicant in this Application and Respondent No.4 in Election Petition.
Mr. P. Bhushan Kakade for the Petitioner.
Mr. P.M. Bhat and Mr. Nitin Mulye for Respondent No.1
Mr. Pradeep Rajgopal i/by Ms. Rekha Rajgopal for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 3rd SEPTEMBER, 2010
P.C.:
deleting the name from the Election Petition filed by the Petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner fairly conceded that they are not opposing this Application and the Petitioner is ready to delete the name
of Respondent No.4 - Union of India, from the Election Petition.
costs. Respondent No.4 is deleted from the array of the parties.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Union of India
Mr. Dahyabhai Vallabhai Patel
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
