Disposed
Sonkhar Industrial Salt Works Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCCAF/4095/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
4095-4587
mss
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4095 OF 2008
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2945 OF 2006
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4096 OF 2008
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2944 OF 2006
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4776 OF 2008
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2943 OF 2006
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4777 OF 2008
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2941 OF 2006
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4778 OF 2008
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 615 OF 2007
2
4095-4587
mss
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4779 OF 2008
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2939 OF 2006
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3612 OF 2008
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2940 OF 2006
Mr. C. M. Korde i/b S. D. Patil for the applicants Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP for respondents
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & R. V. MORE, JJ.
DATED: 1/10/2010
P.C.
In this group of civil applications, the prayer is that delay in filing the cross objections may be condoned.
We have heard learned counsel for the parties.
For the reasons stated in the civil applications, delay is
3
4095-4587
mss
condoned. Civil Applications are disposed of.
(SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
(R. V. MORE, J.)
Ranjana Desai
R. V. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court