The High Court allowed the withdrawal of PIL No. 98 of 2009 pending in the Supreme Court, disposing of the petition with a clear statement of non-ecopinion.
Permission to withdraw the petition is allowed; the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
srp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 98 OF 2009
M/s. Resources of Aviation Redressal Association. ..Petitioner. Versus. Union of India and Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr. S. Shetty for the petitioner.
Mr. Apurv Harsh i/b M. V. Kini and Co., for respondent no.2. Mr. Bhavik Manek i/b Wadia Ghandy & co., for respondent no.3.
Coram : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & R. V. MORE, JJ. Date : September 30, 2010.
P. C. :
(R.V. More, J.) (Smt. Ranjana Desai, J.)
M/s. Resources of Aviation Redressal Association
Union of India
Ranjana Desai
R. V. More
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
