The single judge allowed a civil application in a first appeal to bring deceased respondent's legal heirs on record and set aside abatement, without oral arguments.
Application made absolute; names of heirs brought on record; abatement set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CAF+3099
mss
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3099 OF 2009
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 461 OF 2000
ICHALKARANJI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
.. APPLICANT
Vs.
SMT. SHILAJADEVI @ VAHINISAHEB TRIMBAKRAO PRATINIDHI, Since deceased by her legal heirs & representatives 1A. Trimbakrao @ Appasaheb Bhavanrao Pratinidhi & ORS. ..
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. T. S. Ingale for the applicant Ms. M. S.Salekar i/b R.S. Apte for R-1A to 2D.3. Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP for R-3 & 4.
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI &
R. V. MORE, JJ.
DATED : 1/10/2010
P.C.
We have heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel
for the respondents.
2
CAF+3099
mss
to 2(D)3 be brought on record of this first appeal as legal heirs and representatives of deceased respondent 2(D). It is also prayed that the abatement of the first appeal be set aside. It must be noted that the heirs of respondent 2(D) have been served and learned counsel Ms. Salekar is appearing for the said heirs/respondents. What is stated in the civil application has not been controverted.
(SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
Ichalkaranji Municipal Council
Smt. Shilajadevi @ Vahinisheb Trimbakrao Pratinidhi
Trimbakrao @ Appasaheb Bhavanrao Pratinidhi
Ranjana Desai
R. V. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
