Single judge allowed the civil application permitting parties not to execute the impugned decree and granting liberty to apply for modification or settle the matter.
Liberty granted to parties not to execute the impugned decree; liberty granted to apply for modification or settle the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caf2918.10.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2918 OF 2010 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1043 OF 2010
Shri Balaram Kamlu Pawshe
....Applicant.
Vs.
Shri Sitaram Kamlu Pawshe & Ors.
....Respondents.
Mr. R.V. Paranjape i/by Mr. V. N. Tayade for the Applicant. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 13th August, 2010
P.C.:
1 Considering the averments made at this stage, it is necessary for the parties to not to proceed with the implementation and execution of the judgment and decree in question. The liberty is granted to the Respondents to apply for appropriate orders and/or for modification of this order. The liberty is also granted to the parties to settle the matter.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Shri Balaram Kamlu Pawshe
Shri Sitaram Kamlu Pawshe & Ors.
Anoop V. Mota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
