Disposed
P. R. Parekh v. Union of India and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/921/1988
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This is a short order. The parties agreed the issue was covered by a precedential decision. The writ petition was withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
rng
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶4
WRIT PETITION NO. 921 OF 1988
¶5
P.R.Parekh
¶6
Petitioner
¶7
Vs.
¶8
Union of India & ors
¶9
Respondents
¶10
Mr.Vikram Nankani i.b Mr.S.D.Nankani for Petitioner Mr.A.S.Rao for Respondents
¶11
CORAM : F.I.Rebello and J.H.Bhatia, JJ DATED : 22nd April, 2009
¶12
P.C.
¶13
- The facts need not be set out. The parties are in agreement that the issue is squarely covered by the decision in Mafatlal Industries Ltd vs Union of
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
P.R. Parekh
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
AI extract
F.I. Rebello
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court