Writ petition regarding grant of additional examination chance. Court noted university had already issued circulars allowing opportunity. Held no further directions to the college were necessary as grievance was ventilated; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 752 OF 2008
MR. ANTONIO ROHAN OSWIN FERNANDES BARRETO AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus THE GOA UNIVERSITY THROUGH VICE CHANCELLOR AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents
... Respondents
Mr. Joseph Vaz, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. A. Agni, Advocate for Respondent no.1/University. Mr. G. K. Sardessai, Advocate for the Respondent no.2. Mr. S. Bandodkar, Addl. Government Advocate for Respondent no.3.
Coram:B. P. DHARMADHIKARI &
U. D. SALVI, JJ.
Date:22nd April, 2009
P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Advocate Ms. Agni for the University and Mr. Sardessai, Advocate for the Respondent no.2-College.
no.2-College states that no such directions are necessary as respondent no.2-College is bound to act in terms of the University Circular.
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
U. D. SALVI, J.
arp/*
MR. ANTONIO ROHAN OSWIN FERNANDES BARRETO AND ANR.
THE GOA UNIVERSITY THROUGH VICE CHANCELLOR AND 2 ORS.
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
U. D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
