Petitioner sought additional examination chance and college admission. Court noted University issued circular allowing extra chances and directed College to comply, disposing of petition as grievance ventilated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 717 OF 2008
SHRI. ROHAN @ DATTARAJ VINAYAK PEDNEKAR ... Petitioner Versus GOA UNIVERSITY THROUGH REGISTRAR AND ANR., ... Respondents
... Respondents
Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. A. Agni, Advocate for Respondent no.1/University. Mr. G. K. Sardessai, Advocate for the Respondent no.2.
Coram:B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:22nd April, 2009
P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Advocate Ms. Agni for the University and Mr. Sardessai, Advocate for the Respondent no.2-College.
no.2-College is bound to act in terms of the University Circular.
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
U. D. SALVI, J.
arp/*
SHRI. ROHAN @ DATTARAJ VINAYAK PEDNEKAR
GOA UNIVERSITY THROUGH REGISTRAR
RESPONDENT NO.2-COLLEGE
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
U.D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
