In Civil Appeal No. 56 of 2009 arising from Excise Appeal No. 4 of 2009, the Court stayed coercive recovery from the applicant subject to a 50% deposit of the outstanding amount by 30.06.2009.
Stay of coercive recovery subject to deposit of 50% of the outstanding amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2009
IN
EXCISE APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2009
M/S. BETTS INDIA PVT LTD ... Applicant Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ... Respondent
Ms. Priyanka Kamat, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. C. A. Ferreira, Asst. Solicitor General for the respondent.
Coram:B. P. DHARMADHIKARI &
U. D. SALVI, JJ.
Date:22nd April, 2009
P.C.
Heard.
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
U. D. SALVI, J.
*am/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the stay of coercive recovery should be granted subject to deposit of 50% of the outstanding amount.
M/S. BETTS INDIA PVT LTD
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
U. D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
