Disposed
Mr. Dyneshwar G. Gadekar, Pernem-Goa. v. Govt.of Goa and 2 Anr.
Bombay HCWP/500/2003
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 500…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 500 OF 2003
MR. DYNESHWAR G. GADEKAR, PERNEM-GOA. ... Petitioner Versus GOVT.OF GOA AND 2 ANR., ... Respondents
Shri Arun Bras De Sa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. Kantak, Advocate General With Mr. V. Rodrigues, Addl. Government Advocate for Respondent nos. 1 to 3.
Coram:SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & N. A. BRITTO, J.
Date:19th June, 2009
P.C.
The counsel appearing for respondents submits that they would consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment in the similar circumstances in which the seven persons admittedly who were working with the petitioner were given appointments in other Government Departments. In view of the statement made nothing survives in the petition. The Government to consider the case within 8 days from today.
SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
at*
MR. DYNESHWAR G. GADEKAR
GOVT.OF GOA
SWATANTER KUMAR
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court