Disposed
Premanand S. Verenkar v. Deputy Collector and Anr.
Bombay HCMCA/97/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 97 OF 2009
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2000
PREMANAND S. VERENKAR Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND ANR.,
... Applicant
... Respondents
Mr. R. G. Ramani, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Guru Shirodkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents.
Coram:SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & N. A. BRITTO, J.
Date:21st March, 2009
P.C.
We have heard the Counsel appearing for the parties. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that no appeal has been preferred against the Judgment of this Court dated 6.8.2008. Let the enhanced amount be paid to the claimant within 4 weeks from today. Let the amount deposited along with accrued interest thereon be paid to the claimant by the Registry of this Court. Application stands disposed off.
SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
ssm.
Premanand S. Venkarkar
Deputy Collector
Swatanter Kumar
N. A. Britto
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court