This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 355 OF 2004
SMT. MADHURA V.NAIK, PORVORIM-GOA. ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA AND ANR., ... Respondents
Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. G. Bhonsule, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents.
Coram:SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & N. A. BRITTO, J.
Date:15th July, 2009
P.C.
Learned Advocate General submits that the order of termination has been withdrawn. The writ petition renders infructuous. Disposed of as such.
SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
ssm.
Smt. Madhura V. Naik
State of Goa
Swatanter Kumar
N. A. Britto
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
