Writ petition allowed; rule discharged. Court observed the matter is from 1990, no purpose served to keep it on board, and respondents are left to communicate with the Official Liquidator.
Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
mpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3236 of 1990
M/s.Television of Component & Anr. .. Petitioners
versus
Union of India & ors. .. Respondents
Ms. Tulsi Zaveri i/b Kamal & Co. for the petitioners Mr. A.S. Rao with Mr.Rohit Pardeshi for the respondents.
CORAM : F. I. REBELLO AND
D.G. KARNIK, JJ
DATED : 29th September 2009
P.C:-
2
(D.G. KARNIK, J)
(F.I. REBELLO, J)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Television of Component & Anr.
Union of India & ors.
F. I. Rebello
D. G. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
