Motion was allowed in terms of the prayer clause citing Dharmendra Textiles, fixing the matter for final hearing on October 13, 2009, and disposing of the motion accordingly.
Motion allowed in terms of prayer clause (a); matter fixed for final hearing on 13th October 2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
mpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1113 of 2009
IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.62 of 2007
The Commissioner of Central Excise Mumbai-I Commissionerate .. Appellant versus M/s.Microtech Systems .. Respondent
Mr. J.B. Mishra for the appellant.
CORAM : F. I. REBELLO AND
D.G. KARNIK, JJ DATED : 29th September 2009
P.C:-
(D.G. KARNIK, J)
(F.I. REBELLO, J)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dharmendra Textiles, 2008 (231) E.L.T 3 (SC)Referred¶13
The Commissioner of Central Excise Mumbai-I Commissionerate
M/s.Microtech Systems
F. I. REBELLO
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
