In this 1990 writ petition concerning interim release of goods, the High Court observed that the matter is of no current purpose given its age and discharged the rule, allowing respondents to communicate orders to the Official Liquidator.
Rule discharged; liberty given to respondents to communicate orders to Official Liquidator.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
mpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3235 of 1990
M/s.Television of Component & Anr. .. Petitioners
versus
Union of India & ors. .. Respondents
Ms. Tulsi Zaveri i/b Kamal & Co. for the petitioners Mr. A.S. Rao with Mr.Rohit Pardeshi for the respondents.
CORAM : F. I. REBELLO AND
D.G. KARNIK, JJ
DATED : 29th September 2009
P.C:-
2
(D.G. KARNIK, J)
(F.I. REBELLO, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed in 1990 regarding interim release of goods still requires adjudication at this stage.
M/s. Television of Component & Anr
Union of India & ors
F. I. Rebello
D. G. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
