The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the criminal writ petition, dismissed it as withdrawn, recorded disapproval for abusing the process of law via duplicate petitions, and issued a warning with news to be recorded in the prison register.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2860 OF 2009
Ravi Sitaram Naidu.
.. Petitioner.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents.
Mr. Rupesh A. Zade i/by R.A. Ruryawanshi for the petitioner.
Mr. A.S. Gadkari, APP., for respondent/State.
CORAM : J. N. PATEL &
A.A. SAYED, JJ
DATE : 4TH DECEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :
After the affidavit in reply is filed by the Jailor attached to Nashik Road Central Prison, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
2
jail and a Division Bench of this Court has allowed the same by its order dated 14.10.2009. This is an abuse of the process of law by the petitioner and we record our disapproval..
( J. N. Patel, J)
(A.A. SAYED, J)
Ravi Sitaram Naidu
The State of Maharashtra
J. N. Patel
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
