Writ petition dismissed as Municipal Council had already initiated appeal proceedings against Respondent No.4, rendering further intervention unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITIN NO.2757 OF 2008
Anil Ghante .. Petitioner V/s State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondens.
Mr.M.S.Karnik for the Petitioner. Mr.A.H.Palekar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr.R.S.Khadapkar for Respondent No.3. Mr.B.D.Joshi for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : J. N. PATEL &
A.A.SAYED, JJ
DATE : 2ND DECEMBER, 2009
P.C. :
2
Respondent No.4 and record his objection, if any, subject to his locus standi in law.
(J.N.PATEL, J)
(A.A.SAYED, J)
Anil Ghante
State of Maharashtra
Municipal Council
Respondent No.4
J.N. PATEL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
