This is a thin order wherein the petitioner was permitted to withdraw the criminal writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with no costs.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.282/2009
------------------------------------------------------
Pandurang Vithal Thadake
. . PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others .. RESPONDENTS
Shri G.R.Thigale,Adv. for petitioner . Shri N.N.Jadhav,A.P.P.for respondents 1 & 2 Shri N.V.Gaware,Adv.for R.4 to 6.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & R.K.DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 22/06/2009
ORAL ORDER :
The learned counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Accordingly Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
[R.K.DESHPANDE,J.]
[P.V.HARDAS,J.]
umg/criwp282-09
Pandurang Vithal Thadake
The State of Maharashtra
P.V.HARDAS
R.K.DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
