Petitioner sought withdrawal of criminal writ petition to file a private complaint. Court dismissed the petition on the basis of withdrawal without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.218/2009
Mrs.Parwatibai w/o Shankarrao Raut
.. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. RESPONDENTS
Shri A.G.Kanade,Adv.for petitioner Shri N.N.Jadhav,APP for respondents 1 to 3. Shri Alok Sharma,Assistant Solicitor General for R.4.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & R.K.DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 22/06/2009
ORAL ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition as the petitioner intends to file a private complaint against the accused. In the light of that statement, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
[R.K.DESHPANDE]
JUDGE
[P.V.HARDAS]
JUDGE
umg/criwp218-09
2
Mrs.Parwatibai w/o Shankarrao Raut
The State of Maharashtra
P.V.HARDAS
R.K.DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
