A criminal writ petition seeking payment of loss is dismissed because the Supreme Court, dismissing the petitioner's SLP, held the remedy lay elsewhere, not before the High Court's extraordinary jurisdiction.
The petitioner's prayer for payment of Rs. 21.00 Lac was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1810 OF 2009
R. V. Bhasin ... ... ... Petitioner. Versus The Municipal Commissioner & Ors.... ... ... Respondents.
Petitioner present in-person. Ms. Seema Ranade for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms. U. V. Kejriwal, APP for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : J. N. PATEL and A. A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER,2009.
P. C.:
Heard. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner-in-person, who is a practising advocate of this Court, wherein the following prayers are made :
2
reliefs as sought for in the petition after the Special Leave Petition preferred by the petitioner seeking quashing of the order of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate passed on 16th April, 1997 and the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court passed on 12th August, 2008, has been dismissed by the Supreme Court.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can entertain a writ petition for monetary relief wherein the Supreme Court has already dismissed the SLP with observation that the remedy lies elsewhere and not before the High
R. V. Bhasin
The Municipal Commissioner & Ors.
J. N. PATEL
A. A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
