The High Court allowed the applicant's application for release of seized property subject to the Investigating Officer's consent, directing the Trial Court registrar to comply forthwith.
Released the property in favour of the applicant in terms of prayer clause (1).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.393 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.300 OF 2007
Rajendra Batukbhai Salot
.. Applicant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Mr.M.D. Deboo for the applicant
Ms.U.V.Kejriwal, A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : J. N. PATEL &
A.A. SAYED, JJ
DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2009
P.C. :
2
valuation report of the ornaments issued by Popley and Sons Jewellers. The same is taken on record and marked X for identification. We‘ ’ therefore, allow the application in terms of prayer clause (1). Application is disposed of accordingly.
( J. N. Patel, J)
(A.A. Sayed, J)
Rajendra Batukbhai Salot
State of Maharashtra
J. N. Patel
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
