Khimjibhai Harjivanbhai Patadia v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Appellate…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Appellate Side Criminal Writ Petition No.133 of 2009
Shri Khimjibhai Harjivanbhai Patadia Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashta & & ors. Respondents
Respondents
Mr.R.N.Kachave for petitioner. Mr.D.P.Adsule, APP for State.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & R.Y. GANOO,JJ.
November 6, 2009.
P.C.
We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears that he had already filed a complaint before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate at Borivali and the said complaint was dismissed after recording statements under Section 202 of Cr.P.C. The petitioner has the remedy of challenging the said order before the Sessions Court in appropriate proceedings. Hence the learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave granted and the petition is disposed as withdrawn with liberty as is available in law.
Shri Khimjibhai Harjivanbhai Patadia
The State of Maharashtra
B.H. Marlappalle
R.Y. Ganoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court