In Criminal Appeal No.256 of 2009, this court rejected the applicant's bail application. The applicant, convicted of murder and grievous hurt, sought suspension of the sentence. The court held no case was made out to release the applicant on bail.
Application for bail during the pendency of the appeal rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Appellate Side Criminal Application No.332 of 2009 In
Criminal Appeal No.256 of 2009
Naruddin Murtujaali Shaikh
Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra Respondent
Mr.P.B.Kakade for applicant. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for State.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & R.Y. GANOO,JJ.
November 6, 2009.
P.C.
2
on 19/1/2007. PW 2 was the watchman of the society in which the dispensary was located. The prosecution case was based on circumstantial evidence. We have perused the reasoning set out in support of the order of conviction and sentence.
(R.Y.GANOO,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to an appellant convicted under Sections 302, 452 and 394 of IPC during the pendency of the appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Naruddin Murtujaali Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
B.H.MARLAPALLE
R.Y.GANOO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
