Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn without substantive adjudication on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rng
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1117 OF 2008
B.J.Patel
Petitioner
Vs.
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Board & anr .. Respondents
Ms.Mamta Sadh i.b.Mr.P.G.Sawant for Petitioner Mr.Prantik Mazumdar i.b M/s M.P.Savla & Co for
Applicant
Mr.P.R.Patil for Respondent no.1 Mr.P.Jadhav AGP for Respondent nos. 1 and 2
CORAM : J.N.PATEL AND SMT V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ DATED : 11th February, 2009
P.C.
to withdraw the petition.
Extra-Ordinary remedy under Articles 226/227 of
the Constitution of India.
{ Smt V.K.Tahilramani, J } { J.N.Patel, J }
B.J.Patel
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Board
J.N.Patel
Smt.V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
