A testamentary suit was abated as the petitioner had expired long back. The second executor had relinquished rights in his favour. The petition was disposed of with liberty but no costs awarded.
liberty granted
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.35 OF 1998 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.58 OF 1998
Kisan P. Peswani ...Plaintiff.
Vs.
Kuverdevi D. Vadgama, Dinesh Damji Vadgama ...Defendant.
Mr.C.S.Karkera for the Plaintiff. Dinesh Damji Vadgama, defendant in person. Mr.Jiten M. Vadgama in person.
CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 25th August, 2009.
P.C.-
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Kisan P. Peswani
Kuverdevi D. Vadgama
Dinesh Damji Vadgama
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
