The High Court of Bombay disposed of Suit No. 1455 of 2001 by admitting and enforcing settlement terms signed between the plaintiff and the first defendant. Notices of motion were also disposed of with liberty to the remaining defendants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
SUIT NO. 1455 OF 2001 ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.631/2009 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3462/2008
| Subhlaxmi Securities Ltd. | .... | Plaintiffs |
|---|---|---|
| vs | ||
| Harivallabh L. Agarwal & ors. | ... | Defendants |
Mr.G.B.Kedia for the plaintiffs.
Ms.Archana Khan for defendant no.1.
Ms.V.S.Avasare, 2nd Asstt to Court Receiver.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 25th August, 2009
P.C.:
1 The plaintiff and defendant no.1 had arrived at Settlement and accordingly signed Consent Terms dated 14.08.2009. The consent terms are signed by the concerned parties and their respective Advocates. There is no dispute about the identification of the person as well as the signature. The plaintiff is not pressing the Suit against defendants 2 and 3. Therefore, the present Consent Terms are signed only by defendant no.1 and the plaintiff.
2 The statement is made by the learned counsel for the parties that the present compromise/consent Terms is well within the frame work of law and the
2
record.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Subhlaxmi Securities Ltd.
Harivallabh L. Agarwal
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
