High Court at Bombay dismissed a testamentary suit via Probate Petition, ruling that the petition abated as all executors expired. Disposition granted liberty with no costs.
The Probate Petition stands disposed of with liberty. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 35OF 1996 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.84 OF 1993
Kaikhusru R. Alpaiwalla ...Plaintiff.
Vs.
Piloo S. Shroff ...Defendant.
Mr.Gaurav Joshi with Mr.B.G.Saraf for defendants 3 and 4.
CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 25th August, 2009.
P.C.-
1 In view of Division Bench judgment of this Court in Thrity Sam Shroff v. Shiraz Byramji Anklesaria & anr., 2007(2) Bom.C.R. 560 between the same parties, arising out of same proceedings, as all the executors have expired, there is nothing survives in this Probate Petition.
2 The above Probate Petition stands disposed of accordingly with liberty. No costs.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Thrity Sam Shroff v. Shiraz Byramji Anklesaria & anr.Followed¶1
Thrity Sam Shroff v. Shiraz Byramji Anklesaria & anr., 2007(2) Bom.C.R. 560 · Who else cites this
Anoop V. Motta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
