Dismissed
Shanti R. Nichani v. Nisha Radheshyam Agarwal and Anr.
Bombay HCSS/3730/1998
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
SUMMARY SUIT NO.3730 OF 1998
Shanti R. Nichani
..Plaintiff.
Vs.
Nisha Radheshyam Agarwal and another
..Defendants.
Ms. Yogita Sherla i/b Rajesh L. Shethia for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
18th July, 2009.
P.C. :
The suit has been listed on Board for dismissal under Rule 227 of
the High Court (Original Side ) Rules. The Learned Advocate appearing for the Plaintiff states that after the Motion was made absolute on 6th May, 2000, no instructions have been forthcoming from the Plaintiff. As a result it has been stated that the Summons for Judgment could not be taken out and there are no further instructions in the matter. In these circumstances the Court is constrained to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution.
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court