Suit dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence and lack of interest of the plaintiff and its advocate. No legal principle discussed.
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spb
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 1163 OF 1998
Bhuwalka Steels Industries Ltd., .. Plaintiff.
V/s.
Mumbai Port Trust & Anr.. .. Defendants. ---
None for the Plaintiff.
Mr. U.J. Makhija with Mr. Parag Khandhar i/by M/s.Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe for the Defendants.
CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED : 16TH JULY, 2009
P.C. :
The Plaintiff and its Advocate were absent on 8th and 15th July, 2009 when the suit was listed. Accordingly, under the direction of the Court the suit has been placed under the caption of dismissal today. The Plaintiff and its Advocate are absent today also. Evidently, the Plaintiff has lost interest in the proceedings. In the circumstances, the Court is constrained to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution.
(DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)
Bhuwalka Steels Industries Ltd.
Mumbai Port Trust
Anr.
DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
