V.V. Saraf v. Pratibhuti Vinihit Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit disposed of on consent terms; allegations withdrawn and undertaking accepted; parties present in court.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
SUMMARY SUIT NO.2112 OF 1998
Vandana V. Saraf. .... Plaintiff. Vs. Pratibhuti Vinihit Pvt. Ltd. .... Defendant. ....
Mr.Pravin Diwan i/b. Kanga & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr. Sean Wassoodev with Mr.J.V. Vashi for the Defendant.
...... CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 14th October, 2009.
P.C. :
Consent Terms signed by the Plaintiff and by an authorised
signatory of the Defendant and by the Advocates for the parties are tendered and taken on record and marked “X”. The dispute between the parties is settled and the Court is informed that all allegations are withdrawn. In the circumstances, and in terms of the request made before the Court, the undertakings contained in the Consent Terms are accepted and the suit shall stand disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. Both the Plaintiff and the authorised repressentative of the Defendant are present before the Court.
Coram
DR. D.Y. Chandrachud
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court