In the absence of the plaintiffs and their advocates who failed to comply with extended time limits, the court dismissed the suit for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
SUIT NO.3883 OF 1988
M/s. Poonam Metal Corpn. ..Plaintiffs
Vs.
M/s. Ghatlia Reeds Mfg. Works
..Defendants
None present for the parties
CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATE: 12TH OCTOBER, 2009
P.C. :
By an order of the Court dated 10th August 2009, time for compliance of the order dated 29th June 2009 was extended until 14th September 2009. The Plaintiff was placed on notice that in the event that the talks for settlement fail, an Affidavit of evidence and a compilation of the original documents shall be filed by the next date of hearing and no further extension of time shall be granted. The order has not been complied with and the Plaintiffs and their Advocates are absent. In the circumstances, the Suit shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J)
M/s. Poonam Metal Corpn.
M/s. Ghatlia Reeds Mfg. Works
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
