Disposed
Saman Govind Gohil v. Mumbai Municipal Corporation and 3 Ors.
Bombay HCNMW/50/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.50 OF 2009
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.17 OF 2009
Samant Govind Gohil ....Petitioner
V/s.
Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors. ....Respondents
Mr.R.K. Yadav with Ms.Jai V. Kanade for the
Petitioner.
Mr.Anil Singh for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
DATED : 4TH FEBRUARY, 2009.
P.C. :
1. If T.D.S. is to be deducted in law, it must
be so deducted. Respondent No.4 however shall pay
T.D.S. amount to the authorities and furnish
necessary T.D.S. certificate to the Petitioner within
six weeks of the payment of the amount to the
Petitioner.
2. The Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed
of.
Samant Govind Gohil
Mumbai Municipal Corporation
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court