The High Court held that there is no adjudication of the alleged claim based on the documents produced. Consequently, the Court ruled that it is not sufficient to proceed further in the Insolvency Petition.
Petition disposed as sufficient to proceed further in light of lack of adjudication on documents produced.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INSOLVENCY PETITION NO.39/2008
Ashok Bansilal Agarwal Vs. Vikas Narendra Chirawawala
Petitioner
Respondents
Mr.Shubhangi Chavan,for the petitioner
CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR,J. DATE : 3rd February,2009.
P.C.
There is no adjudication of the alleged claim on the basis of the documents produced . It is not sufficient to proceed further in this Petition.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the alleged claim can be adjudicated on the basis of the documents produced.
Whether the Insolvency Petition can proceed further.
Ashok Bansilal Agarwal
Vikas Narendra Chirawawala
S.J.VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
