Sudha Tanaji Naikdhure v. Manisha Murlidhar Bagwe
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN ITS TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDEICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.63 OF 2009 IN MISC. PETITION NO.67 OF 2008 IN PETITION NO.912 OF 2008
Tanaji Tulaji Naikdhure ..Deceased. Sudha Tanaji Naikdhure ..Petitioner. Vs. Manisha Murlidhar Bagwe ..Respondent.
Mr. Jitendra M. Patil for the Petitioner. Mr. Harish Bhatia for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
3rd July, 2009.
P.C. :
The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that the Notice of Motion is not pressed and that the Petition itself may be placed on Board for hearing. The Respondent has no objection. The Petition is accordingly directed to be placed on Board for hearing on 10th July, 2009. The Motion is accordingly disposed of.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUDHA TANAJI NAIKDHURE
- respondent
MANISHA MURLIDHAR BAGWE
Coram
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court