Disposed
Khairunissa M. Arif and Anr. v. Faiyaz a. Ajmatulla Shaikh
Bombay HCCST/36/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN ITS TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDEICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.36 OF 2009 IN MISC. PETITION NO.691 OF 2005 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.87 OF 2004
Khairunissa Mohamed Arif and another ..Petitioners. Vs. Faiyaz Ahmed Ajmatullah Shaik ..Respondent. And Smt. Hamida Bi D/o Mohammed Arif and othes ..Applicants. ....
Mr. S. Thorat for the Petitioners. Ms Rajyalaxmi i/b ALMT Legal for the Respondent. Mr. B.M. Salunkhe for the Applicants.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
3rd July, 2009.
P.C. :
On the request of the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the
Applicants the Chamber Summons is dismissed as not pressed with liberty
to adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
Khairunissa Mohamed Arif
Faiyaz Ahmed Ajmatullah Shaik
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court