Mafatlal Finance Co. Ltd. v. Inderjeet Singh Punn and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C J.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1188 OF 1998
Mafatlal Finance Co. Ltd.
.....Plaintiffs.
Vs.
Inderjeet Singh Punn & Anr
.....Defendants.
None present for the parties
CORAM: DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
2nd July, 2009.
P.C.
The learned advocate for the plaintiffs has taken discharge in the matter. However, no steps have been taken by the plaintiffs to engage an advocate to pursue the proceedings. There is no appearance on behalf of the plaintiffs on 25th June, 2009. In these circumstances, the Court is constrained to dismiss the Suit for want of prosecution. Order accordingly.
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court