Appeal against writ petition dismissed as infructuous because the parties settled the matter out of Court.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.{1}.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.381 OF 2008
AGAINST
WRIT PETITION NO.2022 OF 2008
Shri Manohar Santu Sherkar. ..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Gestetner (India) Ltd.. ..Respondent.
Mr.S.N.Deshpande, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr.Sooraj Hulke, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : 13TH FEBRUARY, 2009.
P.C.:-
1. The learned Counsel for the parties conveyed
that the matter is settled out of Court. Copy of the
settlement deed is tendered. The same is taken on
record and marked "X" for identification. The
appellant is present and the Demand Draft drawn on
State Bank of India has been handed over to the
appellant.
2. In view of the fact that the parties have
settled the matter out of Court, the Appeal is
dismissed as infructuous.
[J.N.PATEL,J.]
.{2}.
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Shri Manohar Santu Sherkar
M/s. Gestetner (India) Ltd.
J.N. PATEL
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court