The Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment in Writ Petition No. 1092 of 2008 was allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed accordingly. No order as to costs.
Letters Patent Appeal allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 185 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1092 OF 2008
Ashfaque Jan Mohammed Shaikh. .. Appellant.
vs.
Nilofar Ashfaque Shaikh. .. Respondent.
Mr. Vilas B. Tapkir for the Appellant.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL, &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE: 12TH FEBRUARY, 2009.
P.C.
. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant
states that he has instructions from the appellant to
withdraw the Letters Patent Appeal. Allowed to
withdraw. The Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn. No order as to costs.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
(Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.)
2
Ashfaque Jan Mohammed Shaikh
Nilofar Ashfaque Shaikh
J.N. PATEL
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court