Interim order dismissing a Letters Patent Appeal directed at an employer. The court refused to interfere with a direction to deposit wage arrears, leaving the matter disposed of.
Direction to deposit wage arrears was not interfered with. Appeal dismissed. Civil application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 188 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9163 OF 2007
Jayantilal Pokhrajmal Shah. .. Appellant.
vs.
Valiualla Samtulla Ansari
& Ors. .. Respondents.
Mr. S.S. Pakale for the Appellant.
Ms. Jene Cox for Respondent No.1.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL, &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE: 12TH FEBRUARY, 2009.
P.C.
. Heard.
. This being an interim order and particularly in
the nature of directing the appellant employer to
deposit all arrears of wages, we do not find any reason
to interfere in the matter. The Letters Patent Appeal
stands dismissed.
2
2. In view of the dismissal of the Letters Patent
Appeal, the civil application has become infructuous.
Hence, the same also stands dismissed.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
(Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.)
Jayantilal Pokhrajmal Shah
Valiualla Samtulla Ansari
J.N. PATEL
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court