The High Court dismissed a civil revision application against an appellate decree favoring a landlord on grounds of non-user and bona fide requirement, finding no error warranting interference.
The civil revision application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 182 of 2009
M/s. Ghaisas & Company ...Applicant v/s.
Smt. Rohini Chandrakant Tambwalkar ...Respondents
Shri S.R. Page for the applicant.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
DATED:- August 26, 2009.
P.C.
Heard Counsel for the Petitioner.
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
M/s. Ghaisas & Company
Smt. Rohini Chandrakant Tambwalkar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
