Maruti Valkya Jitekar v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's prayer in Contempt Petition No. 136 of 2009 to withdraw the petition was allowed, and the matter was dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 136 of 2009
Maruti Valkya Jitekar ....Petitioner v/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ....Respondents
Shri S.G.Surana for the petitioner. Shri C.R.Sonawane for respondents 1 to 3.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
DATED:- August 26, 2009.
P.C.
Counsel for the Petitioner on instructions prays that the Petition be allowed to be withdrawn. Hence, dismissed as withdrawn.
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Maruti Valkya Jitekar
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
A.M. Khanwilkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sarika Machindra Nalwade @ Sarika Ambadas Pawar Vs the Chairman, Vidyarthi Hitwardhak Mandal and 3 Ors.
Rafique Abdul Sattar Sayyed and 3 Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and 8 Ors.
Mahalingam R. Devendra and 34 Ors. Vs the Municipal Corporation of Brihanmumbai and 7 Ors.
M/S.Ghaisas and Company Vs Smt.Rohini Chandrakant Tambwalkar