The Court held that no error was committed in the Tribunal's order of 12.3.2007, as the question framed did not arise from the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.18 OF 2009
The commissioner of Central Excise ...Appellant.
Vs.
M/s.Chemtrols Engineering Ltd. ...Respondents.
Mr.Rajinder Kumar , adv. for the Appellant.
Mr.Yogesh Patki a/w S.P.Bharti , advs. for the
Respondents.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
J.H.BHATIA, JJ.
DATED: 21ST APRIL, 2009.
P.C.:
1. After perusing the order of the Tribunal
dated 12.3.2007 and the question as framed, we find
the question doesnot arise from the order and even
otherwise, we find no error in the order of the
Tribunal. Consequently, the appeal stands
dismissed.
(J.H.BHATIA, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
The commissioner of Central Excise
M/s.Chemtrols Engineering Ltd.
F.I. REBELLO
J.H. BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court