Single judge order condoning a 136-day delay in filing an appeal under the Workmen's Compensation Act against an order learned Commissioner.
Delay of 136 days condoned; application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or
Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s
or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders
Mr. S.V.Gangapurwala, Adv.,
for the applicant.
...
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.
DATE: 18/7/2009
P.C.:-
1.HeardlearnedCounselforthe
appellant/applicant. There is delay of 136 days
in causing to file the appeal, seeking to challenge
the order of learned Commissioner under Workmens
Compensation Act. The delay is not deliberate nor
intentional. Substantial rights of the appellant
being involved, the application allowed. Delay
condoned.
(K.U.CHANDIWAL)
JUDGE
agp/ca7120-09
2
Mr. S.V.Gangapurwala
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court