single-paragraph order condoning a 152-day delay in filing an appeal due to the appellant's illiteracy and allowing the application. No substantive legal propositions or summary of facts available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CA NO.2007/2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.1660/2009
Office notes, office Memoranda of
Coram,appearances, Court’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
or directions and Registrar’s orders
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.
DATE : 17th July, 2009.
.HeardMr.Pathanforthe
appellant.
2)There is delay of 152 days in
causing to file appeal. The delay is
trivial in nature, not deliberate,
sufficiently explained. The appellant
is illiterate and could not follow the
niceties, resulting in the order in MACP
No. 281/2007 by the learned Member of
the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
Latur. Consequently, delay condoned,
application allowed as above.
bdv/ca2007.09
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Pathan
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court