The court condoned a trivial delay of 59 days in filing appeals after other compliances were cured, allowing the applications.
The applications were allowed and the delay of 59 days in filing appeals was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
60. CA/63/2009
In
RC/783/2004
WITH
CA/64/2009
In
RC/791/2004
WITH
CA/65/2009
In
RC/786/2004
WITH
CA/66/2009
In
RC/787/2004
Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or
Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s
or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders
Mr. J.S.Gavhane, AGP for the
applicant.
...
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.
DATE: 16/7/2009
P.C.:-
1.Heard learned A.G.P. There is delay of
59 days in filing the appeals. The delay is
trivial in nature. Though I find that the judgment
under challenge is dt.29.8.2003, however, the
matter was pending for other compliances which are
by now cured, the delay being sufficiently
explained, in each of the case, it is condoned.
Applications allowed.
(K.U.CHANDIWAL)
JUDGE
agp/ca63-09gr
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 59 days in filing the appeals is condonable.
Unspecified Applicant
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court