Single judge disposed of a first appeal and civil application regarding a 'No Fault Liability' award, dismissing time for deposit of costs as beyond comprehension.
First Appeal and Civil Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL NO.1783/2007
WITH
C.A. NO.4763/1999
---------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or
Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s
or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders
Mr.D.V.Soman, Adv., for the
appellant.
Mr.Vasant Yadav, Adv., h/f Mr.
M.K.Goyanka, Adv., for respondent
no.1.
...
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : 16th July, 2009
...
P.C.:-
1.Heard Mr. Soman, Advocate, for the
appellant. Time sought for deposit of cost, is
beyond comprehension as the order is dt.7th July,
2008, with a specified period of one week.
2.Indeed, considering the nature of
controversy of award under No Fault Liability,
nothing survives in the matter. The First Appeal
with the Civil Application disposed of.
(K.U. CHANDIWAL)
JUDGE
agp/fa1783-07
Appellant
Respondent No.1
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court