This court dismissed an application to amend a criminal writ petition for quashing an FIR, holding that the documents proposed to be added were not material for the decision. The writ petition was listed for further hearing.
Application for amendment is dismissed. Writ petition listed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2009 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2450 OF 2008
Smt. Nirmal Sanjiv Sharma & Anr. ... ... Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.. ... Respondents.
Mr. S. Zha i/by M/s. Law Global for the Applicant. Mrs. U. V. Kejriwal, APP for the Respondents.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATED : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009.
P. C.:
The FIR has been sought to be quashed by way of the present petition. This application seeking amendment of the petition has been moved. The amendment is only to bring on record certain documents which in our view are not material for deciding whether the FIR should be quashed or not. Hence, application for amendment is misplaced and is dismissed.
Sd/-
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
Sd/-
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Smt. Nirmal Sanjiv Sharma & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
BILAL NAZKI
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
